Company A is importing shoes and clothes from a producer in Thailand. Their customers are several retailers in Germany. After a few weeks, the retailers make complains to Company A that their customers have difficulties with the heels on the shoes. The heels wear out in the cold weather and muddy streets here in Germany. Company A, for its part, makes a complaint to the producer in Thailand about this problem. This complaint was made just a few days after they have received the complaint from their retailers. As time continues and nothing happens Company A then decides to make a re-heel of the damaged shoes. Company A discusses this problem with the producer in Thailand and asks for compensation but as Company A can´t get any straight answers from the producer Company terminates the contract. Provide a legal opinion on the subject from the perspective of the company. This is a viewpoint. Would it make a difference if the contracting parties mentioned a hardship clause?
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
