solution

Netflix, Spotify, Uber, 3D printers; …. are game-changers. Using available information about disruptive businesses, technologies, and/or based on your personal experience, give a critical evaluation and analysis on becoming a disruptive business analyst? Detail the tools approaches a business analysis should develop and adopt in a “disruptive.” Also, analyze the possible ethical dilemmas connected to the disruptive business analyst.The assignment should be 1500-2000-word (+/-10% deviation tolerated) analysis, in Microsoft Word format. Include min. 5 academic sources (i.e., academic journal articles, including facts and figures; chapters in edited books; or monographs) related to the topic, also summarizing your conclusions and recommendations.(suggestion for the structureIntroductionBA practices in disruptive companies and their critical assessmentDilemmasConclusion and Recommendation (including own learnings and takeaways)Deadline: Please see on the Moodle page of the module.The assignment will be assessed based on the following criteria (see the grid on Moodle):· Use of literature 15%· Presentation and Structure15%· The coherence of the analysis 25%· Originality and Creativity25%· Conclusion and Recommendations 20%Papers that do not contain a minimum of five (5) academic sources fail automatically. Academic sources are academic journal articles, including facts and figures, chapters in edited books, and monographs. Poor academic practice (e.g., quoting directly from sources that exceed 10% of the paper) will automatically fail.The resit arrangement for the assignment is the same as above; you may resubmit the same paper, with corrections, that you submitted by the original deadline. The resubmission deadline will be specified on Moodle after the grades for the original submission are published.Academic conduct noticeHarvard-style referencing needs to be used consistently throughout. Incomplete referencing shall result in reporting the case to the Academic Conduct Officer, who keeps a record of such violations. First offenders may resubmit their papers and may receive 40% (BSc) / 50% (MSc) at most. Repeated violations of academic standards shall be sanctioned according to the plagiarism regulations as detailed in the Student Handbook.Where the Academic Conduct Officer has reason to suspect that a piece of work submitted by a student was wholly or in part written by someone other than the student who submitted it, and this has not been disclosed by the student, they may call for the student to defend the work in viva or a written comprehension test. The burden of proof in such a viva or test will be upon the student to demonstrate to the examination panel’s satisfaction his/her full comprehension of the work s/he has submitted. Failure to appear without satisfactory explanation will result in immediate failure of that assessment, with consequences of academic misconduct and sanctions application.