Demonstrate ability to comprehend and summarize in written material.
Instructions
Write a one page analysis of the document provided here following the steps of the writing process, as well as showing the thesis of the article, the main points that support that thesis, and your own response and reaction to the author’s point of view and how it is presented. Do this in complete paragraphs using correct formal English that has been revised, proofed, and edited to show good form.
(the ‘document provided’ is the screenshots below)
https://gyazo.com/3e816d9bc5d2b62776ce56008c4444b6
https://gyazo.com/2e51276e29acca78ba3cb9e8efdd5c6c
https://gyazo.com/868ff81ab783ae5c502a5b85cc85493b
Material to read over before hand:
http://content.nroc.org/DevelopmentalEnglish/unit02/Foundations/writing-a-summary.html
http://rasmussen.libanswers.com/faq/90777
http://content.nroc.org/DevelopmentalEnglish/unit03/Foundations/essential-college-skills-reading-comprehension.html
Grading Rubric
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Category |
Not Submitted |
No pass |
Competence |
Proficiency |
Mastery |
Thesis Identified |
Not Submitted |
Student’s paper did not identify the thesis of the reading passage correctly, or no attempt was made. |
Student’s attempts to identify the thesis of the reading passage are evident in this exercise |
The introductory paragraph remains unclear as to the thesis of the article. |
Student confidently cites the thesis of the passage and builds his/her summary around this information |
Analysis |
Not Submitted |
Student submission includes too few sentences written to show any analysis of the article. Idea development is lacking. |
Student’s sentences tie to main idea of the paragraph assignment, but do not include any in-depth detail |
Student uses examples to show analysis in his/her summary, and most of the summary shows in-depth analysis |
Student’s sentences fully discuss main ideas of the article, offer in-depth original ideas about the article offering an in-depth analysis of the reading. |
Organization |
Not Submitted |
Inadequate organization of the one page analysis of the article as assigned, or too little is written to evaluate. Incomplete analysis other than “surface†summary offered |
Organization of paper shows attempts to tie in to the major ideas of the article; however, some crucial ideas are omitted or left unexplained. |
Organization correctly organizes paragraphs of paper; however, some elements do not support a clear thesis |
Student’s organization shows thoughtful consideration of possible implications of the article ideas. Student uses support relevant to review entire article |
Sentence Variety |
Not Submitted |
Student’s writing and sentence choices are not coherent. Use of simple and repetitive or incorrect sentences interferes with competent analysis of the selection. |
Student performs mostly cursory repetition of simple sentences. Some varied sentence structures chosen and used correctly. Limited use of transitions used. |
Some varied sentence structures chosen and used correctly, some sentence choices do not show transitions to keep the assignment examination moving from A to B to C. |
Varied sentence structure and simple/complex sentences handled correctly. Demonstrates competent use of the steps of the writing process. Effective use of transitions noted. |
Mechanics |
Not Submitted |
Paper contains incomplete sentences, word usage errors, sentences with mechanical errors etc. that distract from the meaning of the student’s paper. |
Some grammatical and mechanical errors evident in sentence choices for the summary paragraph. Most sentences convey complete thought; however, some are confusing. |
Grammatical and mechanical errors are minimum, and do not distract from meaning of the paper. |
All sentence choices create analysis containing a good topic sentence, through discussion of the main idea of that topic. A variety of simple and complex sentences with no grammatical and/or mechanical errors. |